Share:


The creativity of monuments: the case of bistable Belarusian identity

    Valentinas Beržiūnas Affiliation

Abstract

During the last decades, Belarus has experienced a wave of monument construction, i.e., the monuments as creative practices through which certain historical, cultural and political meanings are constructed and articulated. The process confirms some scientists’ insights that the Belarusian identity is actively created today. However, the scientists who are interested in its construction on a practical level have not paid attention to the process of monument creation in Belarus as it also creates and articulates state identity. The analysis of the monument-making process has revealed that three identity narratives co-exist in Belarus: national-cultural and two political-historical ones, i.e., commonality with Russia and political independence from Russia. The potential contradiction of these political-historical narratives shows that the Belarusian identity is in a dichotomous and uncertain state. Although the spread of the political independence from Russia narrative allows us to talk about the existence of an independent national identity of Belarus (one of the most prominent manifestations was the mass protests in 2020, unpredicted by many scientists) in parallel with the existence of a strong historical-political narrative of commonality with Russia, the identity of Belarus remains in a bistable condition. For this reason, the further development of the Belarusian identity remains uncertain in the long-term perspective.

Keyword : Belarus, Belarusian identity, monumental practices, narratives, social constructivism, state identity

How to Cite
Beržiūnas, V. (2025). The creativity of monuments: the case of bistable Belarusian identity. Creativity Studies, 18(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2025.19764
Published in Issue
Feb 20, 2025
Abstract Views
13
PDF Downloads
7
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Atkinson, D., & Cosgrove, D. (1998). Urban rhetoric and embodied identities: City, nation, and empire at the Vittorio Emanuele II Monument in Rome, 1870–1945. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00083

Bachleitner, K. (2021). Collective memory in international relations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895363.001.0001

BBC. (2019). Belarus demolishes crosses at Soviet-Era execution site. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47816897

Bekus, N. (2010). Struggle over identity: The official and the alternative “Belarusianness”. Central European University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155211843

Belarus.by. (2009–2025). Euphrosyne of Polotsk. https://www.belarus.by/en/about-belarus/famous-belarusians/euphrosyne-of-polotsk

Belarus Holocaust Memorials Project. (2013–2025). Welcome to the Belarus holocaust memorials project. https://www.belarusmemorials.com/

Belarusturist. (2024). Memorial’nyj kompleks “Kurgan Slavy” (Minskaja oblast’). https://belarustourist.by/turistam/sights/kurgan-slavy-minskaya-oblast/?sphrase_id=732

Belta. (2018). DOS’JE: K 220-letiju so dnja rozhdenija Adama Mickevicha. https://belta.by/culture/view/dose-k-220-letiju-so-dnja-rozhdenija-adama-mitskevicha-330604-2018/

Belta. (2019a). Pamjatnik L’vu Sapege ustanovili v Slonime. https://belta.by/culture/view/pamjatnik-lvu-sapege-ustanovili-v-slonime-359255-2019/

Belta. (2019b). Pamjatnik velikomu knjazju Gediminu otkryli v Lide. https://belta.by/regions/view/pamjatnik-velikomu-knjazju-gediminu-otkryli-v-lide-361140-2019/

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, Th. (1999). Socialinis tikrovės konstravimas: žinojimo sociologijos traktatas. Pradai.

Boguslavskaya, А. (2019). Pamjatnik knjazju Gediminu: VKL stanovitsja brendom v Belarusi? Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/ru/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA-%D0%BA%D0%BD%D1%8F%D0%B7%D1%8E-%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83-%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%BB-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%81%D1%8F-%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC-%D0%B2-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B8/a-50328449

Boika, A. (2019). Authorities dismantle crosses in Kurapaty Memorial – key facts. Euroradio.fm. https://euroradio.fm/en/authorities-dismantle-crosses-kurapaty-memorial-key-facts

Campbell, D. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. University of Minnesota Press.

Čepaitienė, R. (2023). The Ricochet of Leninopad and the Second Wave of Desovietization of Lithuanian public space. Adaeqatio rei et Intellectus: Journal for Central and Eastern European History and Politics, 1, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.54881/211rlrc

Čepaitienė, R. (2021). Two waves of rejection of Soviet Monuments in Lithuania. In A. Lastouski & I. Ramanava (Eds.), Communist heritage in Belarus and EU countries: The problem of interpretation and the relevance of conservation: Collection of articles (pp. 58–71). Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Belarus Office/Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies.

Forest, B., & Johnson, J. (2002). Unraveling the threads of history: Soviet-era monuments and Post-Soviet national identity in Moscow. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(3), 524–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00303

Holiday.by. (2025). Pamjatnik knjazju Vseslavu Charodeju v Polocke. https://www.holiday.by/by/skarb/1211-pamjatnik-knjazju-vseslavu-charodeju-v-polocke

Jachovič, J. (2022). The reconstruction of Belarusian national identity: Discourses and processes, 2014–2019 [Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius University, Lithuania]. https://www.tspmi.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Juljan-disertacija.pdf

Khatyn State Memorial Complex. (2025). Khatyn State Memorial Complex. https://khatyn.by/en/

Kurilo, D. (2012). Pamjatnik knjazju krevskomu i vitebskomu, velikomu knjazju litovskomu i russkomu Ol’gerdu ustanovjat v Vitebske. Belta. https://belta.by/culture/view/pamjatnik-knjazju-krevskomu-i-vitebskomu-velikomu-knjazju-litovskomu-i-russkomu-olgerdu-ustanovjat-v-vit-64227-2012/

Lepel-kraj. (2022). Pamjatnik L’vu Sapege. https://lepel-kraj.by/dostoprimechatelnosti/pamyatniki/pamyatnik-lvu-sapege/

Marková, A. (2018). Language, identity, and nation: The special case of Belarusian State- and Nation-Formation. The Journal of Belarusian Studies, 8(3), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.30965/20526512-00803003

Marples, D. R. (1999). Belarus: A denationalized nation. Harwood Academic Publishers.

Neumann, I. B. (1999). Borderlines. Uses of the other: “The East” in European identity formation (Vol. 9). University of Minnesota Press.

Nientied, P., & Janku, E. (2019). Ambiguous memorial landscapes in Post-Socialist Cities: The case of Tiranaʼs pyramid. Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 9(1), 1–23.

Pasternak, T. (2014). Ol’gerd i Vitebsk: tochki nad “I”. Vitebskie vesti. https://vitvesti.by/index.php/kultura/olgerd-i-vitebsk-tochki-nad-i.html

Posokhin, I. (2019). Soft Belarusization: (Re)Building of identity or “Border Reinforcement”? Colloquia Humanistica, 8, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.11649/ch.2019.005

Pranevičiūtė, J. (2007). Baltarusija – neįvykęs fenomenas: visuomenės mobilizacijos perspektyvos. Lietuvos metinė strateginė apžvalga, 5(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.47459/lmsa.2007.5.8

Probelarus. (2012–2023a). Monument to Kirill Turovsky in Turov. https://probelarus.by/belarus/sight/pamyatniki-izvestnym-lyudyam/1503658732.html

Probelarus. (2012–2023b). Monument to Maxim Bogdanovich in Minsk. https://probelarus.by/belarus/sight/pamyatniki-izvestnym-lyudyam/1503313992.html

Probelarus. (2012–2023c). Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Minsk. https://probelarus.by/belarus/sight/pamyatniki-izvestnym-lyudyam/1503390429.html

Proryv.ushachi.museum.by. (2023). Proryv Memorial Complex. Vitebsk Region, Ushachi. http://proryv.ushachi.museum.by/en

Rimaitė, V. (2019a). Paminklų ir politikos santykis Lietuvoje: paminklų tapsmas politinių diskusijų objektu. Politologija, 96(4), 60–91. https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2019.96.3

Rimaitė, V. (2019b). Political monuments in Lithuania: Artistic aesthetics and national identity. Punctum: International Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2019.0024

Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė, V. (2022). Paminklai Lietuvoje: valstybės tapatybės konstravimas [Daktaro disertacija, Vilniaus universitetas, Lietuva]. https://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:126013433/datastreams/MAIN/content

Sb.by: Belarus’ segodnya. (2018). V Hojnikah otkryli pamjatnik jenergetikam – likvidatoram avarii na CHAES. https://www.sb.by/articles/v-khoynikakh-otkryli-pamyatnik-energetikam-likvidatoram-avarii-na-chaes.html

Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Routledge series on interpretive methods. Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854907

Smok, V. (2013). Belarusian identity: The impact of Lukashenka’s rule (Analytical Paper 3). Ostrogorski Centre.

To Belarus!. (2025). 25 famous sculptures and statues in Minsk, Belarus. http://tobelarus.com/minsk/64-sculptures.html

Vdovenko, L. (2025). Pamjatniki nashego goroda: Bogdan Hmel’nickij. Gomel Street. https://gomelstreet.by/kraevedcheskie-zapiski-o-gomele/pamyatniki-nashego-goroda-bogdan-xmelnickij

Vorkov, A. G. (2025). Ostrov slez – muzhestva i skorbi v Minske. https://turby.by/restaurant/ostrov-slez-muzhestva-i-skorbi-v-minske