ESG investment strategies and the financial performance of European agricultural companies: a new modelling approach
Abstract
This paper aims to appraise the impact of ESG credentials on the financial performance of agricultural companies with main headquarters in Europe by examining the strategic ESG investment behaviour of firms in twelve specific sectors. The methodology consists of a two-fold approach: first, cross-sectional FGLS regression with generalised least squares; second, overall interlinkages between considered variables through Bayesian network analysis. The research questions focus on the implications of each ESG pillar – environmental, social, and governance – on the performance of agricultural companies. Key findings entail that the environmental dimension strongly relates to agricultural companies’ outcomes, such as toxic chemicals reduction strategies, waste recycled to the total waste contribution, biodiversity impact reduction, and eco-design products. As regards the social pillar of ESG, salaries and wages positively relate only to shareholders’ earnings, while governance factors like CEO compensation, board structure type, and board’s gender diversity favourably influence the financial performance of agricultural companies. ESG implications for agricultural companies are beneficial when they implement sustainable strategies. These strategies include establishing targets for water efficiency policies, increasing employee turnover, maintaining a steadfast water efficiency policy, enhancing the use of environmentally-friendly products, and reevaluating board structures from unitary to two-tier or mixed types.
First published online 2 January 2025
Keyword : agriculture, ESG, profitability, shareholders’ earnings, sustainable investment, Europe, econometric modelling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adelman, D. E., & Barton, J. H. (2002). Environmental regulation for agriculture: Towards a framework to promote sustainable intensive agriculture. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 21, 3–43.
Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049
Aimurzina, B., Kamenova, M., Omarova, A., Bakytgul, A., Aigul, K., & Nurgul, S. (2019). Methods of sustainable regulation of agricultural enterprises at the present stage. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(5), 1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.5(29).22
Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
Álvarez, A. I. F., Gómez, S., & Méndez, C. F. (1998). The effect of board size and composition on corporate performance. In Corporate governance, financial markets and global convergence (pp. 1–16). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2633-6_1
Annesi, N., Battaglia, M., Ceglia, I., & Mercuri, F. (2024). Navigating paradoxes: Building a sustainable strategy for an integrated ESG corporate governance. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-2006
Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley.
Baltagi, B. H., & Li, Q. (1995). Testing AR(1) against MA(1) disturbances in an error component model. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01646-H
Boakye, D. J., Tingbani, I., Ahinful, G. S., & Nsor-Ambala, R. (2021). The relationship between environmental management performance and financial performance of firms listed in the UK’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM). Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, Article 124034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124034
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
Brandth, B., & Bjørkhaug, H. (2015). Gender quotas for agricultural boards: Changing constructions of gender?. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(6), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12112
Buallay, A. (2021). Sustainability reporting and agriculture industries’ performance: Worldwide evidence. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 12(5), 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-10-2020-0247
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, Article 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131
Chouaibi, S., Rossi, M., Siggia, D., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Exploring the moderating role of social and ethical practices in the relationship between environmental disclosure and financial performance: Evidence from ESG companies. Sustainability, 14(1), Article 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010209
Conca, L., Manta, F., Morrone, D., & Toma, P. (2021). The impact of direct environmental, social, and governance reporting: Empirical evidence in European‐listed companies in the agri‐food sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1080–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2672
Cristea, M., Noja, G. G., Thalassinos, E., Cîrciumaru, D., Ponea, C. Ș., & Durău, C. C. (2022). Environmental, social and governance credentials of agricultural companies – The interplay with company size. Resources, 11(3), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11030030
Darko, J., Aribi, Z. A., & Uzonwanne, G. C. (2016). Corporate governance: The impact of director and board structure, ownership structure and corporate control on the performance of listed companies on the Ghana stock exchange. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2014-0133
Daroshka, V., Aleksandrov, I., Fedorova, M., Chekhovskikh, I., Ol, E., & Trushkin, V. (2022, May). Agriculture and ESG transformation: Domestic and foreign experience of green agribusiness finance. In International Scientific Conference on Agricultural Machinery Industry “Interagromash” (pp. 2357–2368). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21219-2_264
DeBoe, G. (2020). Economic and environmental sustainability performance of environmental policies in agriculture. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, 140. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3d459f91-en
Del Gesso, C., & Lodhi, R. N. (2024). Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: A systematic review of accounting studies. Journal of Accounting Literature. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-08-2023-0143
Epskamp, S. (2016). Regularized Gaussian psychological networks: Brief report on the performance of extended BIC model selection. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/91fa3e5d-6a00-4889-a0d1-e226c1d1174d
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2016). The effect of environmental, social, and governance consistency on economic results. Sustainability, 8(10), Article 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101005
Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 23, 2020–2028. https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6640
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–267). University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, M., Holzinger, & K., Richter (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261–3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2570
Gerber, R., Smit, A., & Botha, M. (2024). An evaluation of environmental, social, and governance reporting in the agricultural sector. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), Article e316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.316
Goel, A., & Sharma, R. (2017). Effect of board size on firm’s performance: Evidences from India. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(22), 139–151.
Halme, M., & Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9712-5
Hawarden, R., & Greenwood, P. (2021). Women in the boardroom: International Governance Stocktake 2021. Thought Leadership Committee, The Chartered Governance Institute, London.
Hřebíček, J., Popelka, O., Štencl, M., & Trenz, O. (2012). Corporate performance indicators for agriculture and food processing sector. Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(4), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260040121
Huang, D. Z. X. (2022). An integrated theory of the firm approach to environmental, social and governance performance. Accounting & Finance, 62, 1567–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12832
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2023). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
Jankelova, N., Masar, D., & Moricova, S. (2017). Risk factors in the agriculture sector. Agricultural Economics/Zemědělská Ekonomika, 63(6), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/212/2016-AGRICECON
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2007). Balanced ScoreCard strategický systém merania výkonnosti podniku. Management Press.
Kim, H. G., Chun, W., & Wang, Z. (2021). Multiple-dimensions of corporate social responsibility and global brand value: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1865109
Kovalchuk, I., Melnyk, V., Novak, T., & Pakhomova, A. (2021). Legal regulation of agricultural taxation. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 479–479. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p479
Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. MIT Press.
Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17). Harvard Business Review.
Latapí, M., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Davíðsdóttir, B., & Morsing, M. (2021). The barriers to corporate social responsibility in the nordic energy sector. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094891
Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
London Stock Exchange Group of companies. (2023). LSEG Data & Analitics. Eikon Database. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/products/eikon-trading-software
Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(2), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1
Malanski, P. D., Schiavi, S., & Dedieu, B. (2019). Characteristics of “work in agriculture” scientific communities. A bibliometric review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0582-2
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso. The Annals of Statistics, 34(3), 1436–1462. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000281
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Melo, T., & Garrido‐Morgado, A. (2012). Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.260
Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66(1), 195–244. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195
Midttun, A., Gjølberg, M., Kourula, A., Sweet, S., & Vallentin, S. (2015). Public policies for corporate social responsibility in four Nordic countries: Harmony of goals and conflict of means. Business & Society, 54(4), 464–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312450848
Mittelbach-Hörmanseder, S., Hummel, K., & Rammerstorfer, M. (2021). The information content of corporate social responsibility disclosure in Europe: An institutional perspective. European Accounting Review, 30(2), 309–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1763818
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, Article 120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
Pavlović, V., Knežević, G., & Bojičić, R. (2018). Board gender diversity and earnings management in agricultural sector – Does it have any influence? Custos e Agronegócio on line, 14(2), 340–363. http://www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br/eng/forty%20six.html
Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7–8), 1311–1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00630.x
Pirtea, M. G., Noja, G. G., Cristea, M., & Panait, M. (2021). Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies. Agricultural Economics/Zemědělská Ekonomika, 67(12), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.17221/286/2021-AGRICECON
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2018). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. In G. G. Lenssen, & N. C. Smith (Eds.), Managing sustainable business: An executive education case and textbook (pp. 323–346). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
Qureshi, M. A., Akbar, M., Akbar, A., & Poulova, P. (2021). Do ESG endeavors assist firms in achieving superior financial performance? A case of 100 best corporate citizens. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211021598
Sneeringer, S. E. (2009). Effects of environmental regulation on economic activity and pollution in commercial agriculture. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2248
Talan, G., Sharma, G. D., Pereira, V., & Muschert, G. W. (2024). From ESG to holistic value addition: Rethinking sustainable investment from the lens of stakeholder theory. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, Article 103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103530
Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
Tleubayev, A., Bobojonov, I., Gagalyuk, T., & Glauben, T. (2020). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from the Russian agri-food industry. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 23(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2019.0011
Turral, H., Burke, J., & Faurès, J. M. (2011). Climate change, water and food security. Water Reports, 36. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20133014321
Vanslembrouck, I., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Verbeke, W. (2002). Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agri‐environmental measures. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00034.x
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Zeng, L., & Jiang, X. (2023). ESG and corporate performance: Evidence from agriculture and forestry listed companies. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086723
Wamba, L. D. (2022). The determinants of environmental performance and its effect on the financial performance of European-listed companies. Journal of General Management, 47(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070211021050
Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
Williams, D. R (2021). Bayesian estimation for Gaussian graphical models: Structure learning, predictability, and network comparisons. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 56(2), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1894412