Impact of income inequality on emigration: case of Lithuania and other new EU member states
Abstract
Purpose – The objective of the article is to analyse how income inequality affects population decisions on emigration.
Research methodology – Correlation and regression analysis are used to determine the relationship between the analysed social phenomena. Firstly, the correlation between income inequality (its change) and emigration rates is calculated. Secondly, the static and dynamic aspect is evaluated, as well as the influence of data delay (lag) on decision-making. Finally, a regression equation is constructed, showing how one variable affects the other.
Findings – The analysis identifies the conditions and severity of population income inequality that may influence their emigration decisions. On the one hand, the impact is more substantial in the crisis and post-crisis period, and, on the other, in the new EU member states.
Research limitations – Sensibility of emigration to different conditions like accessibility (i.e. the opportunity to emigrate freely, such as being a member of the Schengen area) and the income gap between countries of origin and destination is a major limitation of the article which should be examined more closely in later works.
Practical implications – The analysis of emigration problem and the identification of its possible links with income inequality would allow economists to assess a priori potential of various measures suggested in practice and, consequently, would allow for the more targeted formulation of the State economic policy.
Originality/Value – The novelty of the article is defined by insufficient scientific research of relationships between income inequality and emigration as socio-economic phenomena within the new EU member states. A scientific analysis of the problem of emigration and the identification of its possible links with income inequality would contribute to a more detailed study of the scientific aspects of emigration and income inequality.
Keyword : income inequality, emigration, subjective well-being
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Almeida, V. (2020). Income inequality and redistribution in the aftermath of the 2007–2008 crisis: the U.S. case. National Tax Journal, 73(1), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2020.1.03
Amendola, A., Dell’Anno, R., & Parisi, L. (2019). Happiness and inequality in European countries: Is it a matter of peer group comparisons? Economia Politica, 36(2), 473–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0130-6
European Values Study. (2016). https://europeanvaluesstudy.eu/
Eurostat. (2020). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
Franc, S., Casni, A. C., & Barisic, A. (2019). Determinants of migration following the EU enlargement: a panel data analysis. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 14(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2019-0010
Galiano, A., & Romero, J. G. (2018). Brain drain and income distribution. Journal of Economics, 124(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0576-y
Huber, P. J. (2004). Robust statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H., & Graham, C. (2019). Income inequality and well-being in the U.S.: Evidence of geographic-scale- and measure-dependence. Journal of Economic Inequality, 17(3), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-018-9404-z
Ivlevs, A., Nikolova, M., & Graham, C. (2019). Emigration, remittances, and the subjective well-being of those staying behind. Journal of Population Economics, 32(1), 113–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0718-8
Silber, J. (1999). Handbook of income inequality measurement. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1
Kumpikaitė-Valiūnienė, V., & Žičkutė, I. (2017). Emigration after socialist regime in Lithuania: Why the West is still the best? Baltic Journal of Management, 12(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-02-2016-0053
Laurinavičius, A. [Antanas], & Laurinavičius, A. [Algimantas]. (2017). Emigration: a price of inequality or a breach of social contract? In Conference Proceedings “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education ‘2017” (pp. 280–288). Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. https://doi.org/10.3846/cbme.2017.018
Laurinavičius, A. [Antanas], Laurinavičius, A. [Algimantas], & Smilga, E. (2018). Lietuvos strateginio iškilimo gairės. Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
Marchand, Y., Dubé, J., & Breau, S. (2020). Exploring the causes and consequences of regional income inequality in Canada. Economic Geography, 96(2), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1715793
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 23, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611420882
Phyo, E. E., Goto, H., & Kakinaka, M. (2019). International migration, foreign direct investment, and development stage in developing economies. Review of Development Economics, 23(2), 940–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12577
Piketty, T. (2013). Le capital au XXI siècle. Éd. du Seuil.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2018a). Considérations Sur Le Gouvernement de Pologne, Et Sur Sa Réformation Projettée. Wentworth Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2018b). Du Contrat Social, Ou, Principes Du Droit Politique. Wentworth Press.
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Schraff, D. (2020). Is the member states’ curse the EU’s blessing? Inequality and EU regime evaluation. JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13027
Statistics Lithuania. (2020). [Official Statistics Portal]. https://osp.stat.gov.lt/
Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality. Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.11358
Uprety, D. (2019). Does skilled migration cause income inequality in the source country? International Migration, 58(4), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12661
Weimann, J., Knabe, A., & Schoeb, R. (2015). Measuring happiness. The economics of well-being. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10036.001.0001
Yan, B., & Wen, B. (2020). Income inequality, corruption and subjective well-being. Applied Economics, 52(12), 1311–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1661953